Navceed

Workflow break check · your result

Where your lead hand-off from marketing to sales typically breaks

These are the places setups like yours usually fail; they are not findings about your systems, since nothing here looked at them. Each one comes with a way to check it yourself. Navceed is being built to run checks of these six kinds; today it runs them on an example company, and connecting your own tools is coming next.

CaptureForm, webinar or ad to the CRM
2 also check
MatchIs this person already here?
3 check first
1 more
OwnerWho gets the lead
2 check first
1 more
Follow-upSales starts working it
1 check first
3 more
RepliesBack to marketing
2 also check
ReportingStage, source, dates
Not flagged

1. The owner has left or been switched off

Check firstOwnerRun by your CRM adminabout 15 min

Shown because you answered “Rules assign it (by region, company size, round robin)”; “I'm not sure, to: When a rep leaves, what happens to their leads and records?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Ask your CRM admin (or look yourself, if you are the admin) for the list of deactivated users. Count open leads and contacts that still name them as owner, then check the routing rule's list of reps, and any outside routing tool, for the same names.

A lead or account is owned by someone who is deactivated. Updates to it can be refused, and no one is following up.

Why it happens. When people leave, their records are not reassigned and the routing still names them.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin and sales operations (an offboarding checklist).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
Sources: Vendor documentation

2. The same person becomes two (or five) records

Check firstMatchRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “Duplicate rules exist, but imports and integrations skip them”; “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Export leads created in the last 30 days and the existing contacts they could match. Sort by lowercase email, then by last name plus company, and match new leads against all existing contacts, not only the last 30 days. Count the pairs. Repeat with first name plus phone. As a rule of thumb (ours, not a standard), more than 2 to 3 percent of new leads having a twin means matching is leaking.

One person fills two forms, or attends a webinar with a different email, and the CRM creates a second record. Two reps may call them, or neither does because each thinks the other owns it.

Why it happens. Automated writes and file imports may skip the duplicate warning a person typing in the CRM would see, and matching on exact email misses typos and second addresses.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin (matching rules) with marketing operations (what the connection may create).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
Sources: Data-quality report

3. Leads from imports and integrations skip your assignment rules

Check firstOwnerRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “An automation tool or a custom integration someone built”; “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Create one clearly marked test lead through each path your leads take (form, import, integration) and see which arrive with the right owner. Then filter last month's leads by how they were created and compare how many sit with the default owner.

Rules assign owners to leads created one way (a form, a person typing), but leads created by an import or an integration arrive with the default owner, or none.

Why it happens. In some tools, assignment rules run only when each import or call asks for them.

Usually fixed by: Sales operations and the CRM admin.
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
No public source found for this one: it is our reading of how these hand-offs usually work.

4. One person exists as a lead and as a customer contact, owned by different people

Check firstMatchRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “Duplicate rules exist, but imports and integrations skip them”; “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. List every email that appears on both the lead list and the contact list. For each, compare the owners and sort by "owners differ". Open three and check which record your marketing emails and sequences point to.

After a conversion or an import, the same person can exist twice: an early-stage record and an account record, or a second record in the other tool. Each has its own owner, its own history and its own emails.

Why it happens. The conversion or the sync creates a new record instead of linking to the existing one, usually when the owner or queue setup is unusual.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin, with sales operations (who wins ownership).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
Sources: Community thread

5. The lead reaches sales and nothing happens

Check firstFollow-upRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “A mix of both”; “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. List leads created 3 to 30 days ago. Keep those with no logged call, email or task. Split by owner and by source, and divide by all new leads in the period for the share never touched.

The lead is in the CRM with an owner, but no call, email or task follows within the agreed time. It cools while reports show it as handed off.

Why it happens. Nothing links "lead created" to "first action due", so it depends on the rep's habit.

Usually fixed by: The sales leader (the agreed time) with sales operations (alerts, automatic follow-up).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold? Freshness: is the step still running, and on time?
Sources: Research article (2011)

6. A lead from an existing customer is routed as a stranger

Check firstMatchRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “Rules assign it (by region, company size, round robin)”; “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. List last month's new leads whose email domain matches an existing customer account. Compare each lead's owner with the account owner and count the mismatches.

A new lead from a company you already sell to goes round-robin to whoever is next, not to the account's owner. The customer gets a second rep, or a cold sequence.

Why it happens. Routing looks at the lead's own fields and does not look the company up first.

Usually fixed by: Sales operations (routing rules).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
No public source found for this one: it is our reading of how these hand-offs usually work.

Show more (8)

7. Leads that sales rejects or stops working never go back to marketing

Check firstFollow-upRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “A mix of both”; “Automatically, but nobody checks”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Filter leads set to rejected, unqualified or closed in the last 90 days and count how many are in a nurture list or have any marketing touch afterwards.

A lead sales declines or abandons stays with the rep or is closed, and never returns to nurture. It drops out of both teams' view.

Why it happens. Nobody owns the step from "sales said no" to "marketing keeps nurturing".

Usually fixed by: Revenue operations (the status and the recycle rule).
Kind of break, one of six: Return path: does what the next tool did get back to the first? Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
No public source found for this one: it is our reading of how these hand-offs usually work.

8. New leads sit with no real owner

Check firstOwnerRun by your CRM adminabout 15 min

Shown because you answered “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”; “Rules assign it (by region, company size, round robin)”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Filter leads created more than a day ago whose owner is a queue, a default user, an integration user or blank. Group them by lead source and country. The group with the largest count shows the routing rule with the hole.

The lead exists but belongs to a shared queue, a catch-all user, or nobody. No rep sees it in their list, so the response-time clock runs with no one watching.

Why it happens. The assignment rule has no branch for this lead (a new country, a new product, a blank field), so it falls to a default.

Usually fixed by: Sales or revenue operations (routing rules).
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
No public source found for this one: it is our reading of how these hand-offs usually work.

9. The sequence is tied to a record that was merged, converted or deleted

Check firstFollow-upRun by sales opsabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “I'm not sure, to: Is there a rule that should always hold (for example, every lead has an owner within a day), and does anything check it?”; “A mix of both”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. List active enrolments with their CRM record ids and look up a sample of 20 in the CRM. Count how many are missing, converted or merged into another.

A person was enrolled, then the CRM record was merged, converted or deleted. The sales tool keeps pointing at the old one and activity cannot be written back.

Why it happens. Record changes in the CRM are not always carried into the sales tool.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin and sales operations.
Kind of break, one of six: Condition: does a rule that should always hold, hold?
Sources: Vendor documentation

10. A field or list value was changed, so a step now writes into nothing

Worth a quick lookCaptureYou can run thisabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “An automation tool or a custom integration someone built”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Pick the five fields your forms fill most (source, campaign, product interest, phone, country). Submit one clearly marked test lead (tell the team first: it may be routed, enrolled and counted; delete it afterwards) with a distinctive value in each. After one full sync cycle (often 5 to 15 minutes; check your connection's schedule) open the CRM record and the sales-tool record and see which values are missing or in the wrong place. Then ask your admin for the fields and list values changed in the last 90 days and compare them with your form-to-CRM mapping.

Someone renames, retypes or recreates a field, or renames a list value, in one tool. The connection between your marketing tool and the CRM keeps pointing at the old definition, so new answers land in a dead field or are dropped, while records still look like they arrive. Which changes break what differs by tool: a label-only rename often breaks nothing, while a type change, a deleted-and-recreated field or a renamed list value is the usual culprit (our reading).

Why it happens. A connection records a field's name and type once, at first sync, and does not always follow later changes.

Usually fixed by: Marketing operations (the mapping) with the CRM admin (change control).
Kind of break, one of six: Field landed: did each field arrive with a value, in the right place?
Sources: Vendor documentation

11. The CRM refuses a lead because of one answer

Worth a quick lookCaptureYou can run thisabout 20 min

Shown because you answered “An automation tool or a custom integration someone built”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Export last week's form submissions from first-time email addresses only, leaving out internal tests and known spam, and match them by email against the CRM. Ask your admin which rule decides when a submission becomes a lead: some connections create leads only after a qualifying step, so a gap can be by design. Look at the answers of the unmatched ones that should have arrived: the same rare list value, a blank required field or an odd country is your culprit. If your integration has an error log, sort it by error text.

A form answer does not fit a CRM rule: a required field is empty, a list value is not allowed, a validation rule fires. The record can be refused, so the person never appears in the CRM although the form said thank you.

Why it happens. The form was edited, or an admin tightened a rule, and nobody re-tested the path between them.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin (the rules) with marketing operations (the form options).
Kind of break, one of six: Arrival: did it show up in the next tool in time?
Sources: Integration vendor guide · Vendor staff reply in a forum

12. Two systems keep undoing each other's changes

Worth a quick lookMatchRun by your CRM adminabout 30 min

Shown because you answered “An automation tool or a custom integration someone built”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Sort records by last modified in each system and take the 20 most recent. Open the field history of any shared field (status, stage, opt-out). A field that changes back and forth within hours on one record is a loop.

A value flips back and forth (a checkbox, a status, an owner) because each system's change triggers the other's update. History gets noisy and rules that fire on "changed" fire again and again.

Why it happens. Two-way sync that cannot tell a person's edit from the connection's own edit.

Usually fixed by: CRM admin and marketing operations together.
Kind of break, one of six: Field landed: did each field arrive with a value, in the right place?
Sources: Integration vendor guide · Community thread

13. The person is enrolled, but no step is going out

Worth a quick lookFollow-upRun by sales opsabout 20 min

Shown because you answered “A mix of both”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Filter enrolments that are failed, paused or errored, and active ones whose next automatic step was due more than a day ago (leave out manual call steps, which reps skip by habit). Group them by sender. If one sender holds most of them, check that inbox's connection and send limits.

The enrolment shows active, yet the next step never fires. The lead looks worked in reports and is not being worked.

Why it happens. The rep's inbox lost its connection, a send limit was reached, or a send failed, and nobody checks the error list.

Usually fixed by: Sales operations, with the rep.
Kind of break, one of six: Freshness: is the step still running, and on time?
Sources: Vendor documentation

14. Replies and meetings do not come back to marketing

Worth a quick lookRepliesRun by sales opsabout 20 min

Shown because you answered “Automatically, but nobody checks”.

How to check, and why it happens
How to check. Ask a rep for five replies from the last week. For each, open the CRM record by the sender's address and check the reply is logged. Note which failed: different address, no record, auto-reply.

A prospect replies or books a meeting, but the CRM shows no activity. Marketing sees a lead that never engaged, sales sees a hot reply in their inbox, and campaign results undercount.

Why it happens. In many tools, activity is logged only when the reply's address matches a person in both systems, so a second email address, a missing record or an auto-reply breaks the link.

Usually fixed by: Sales operations (activity capture) and the CRM admin (email fields).
Kind of break, one of six: Return path: does what the next tool did get back to the first?
Sources: Vendor documentation

The common questions follow six kinds of check: Arrival (did it show up in the next tool in time?), Return path (does what the next tool did get back to the first?), Count (do the numbers at each end agree?), Freshness (is the step still running, and on time?), Field landed (did each field arrive with a value, in the right place?), Condition (does a rule that should always hold, hold?).

Checking by hand does not last

Everything above is a one-off look. The breaks that cost you are the ones that start next Tuesday, when someone changes a field.

No sign-up was needed for this page and nothing you chose was saved. Print this page to keep it. Start again.